Appendectomy Versus Observation for Appendicitis in Neutropenic Children With Cancer

نویسندگان

چکیده

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of neutropenic appendicitis (NA) in children undergoing cancer therapy remains undefined. Management strategies include upfront appendectomy or initial nonoperative management. We aimed to characterize the effect strategy on complications and length stay (LOS) describe implications for chemotherapy delay alteration. METHODS: Sites from Pediatric Surgery Oncology Research Collaborative performed a retrospective review with NA over 6-year period. RESULTS: Sixty-six children, median age 11 years (range 1–17), were identified while treatment. The most common diagnoses leukemia (62%) brain tumor (12%). Upfront was 41% patients; remainder had Rates abscess perforation at diagnosis equivalent groups (30% vs 24%; P = .23). Of patients who management, 46% (17 37) underwent delayed during same hospitalization. Delayed due failure 65% (n 11) count recovery 35% 6). Cancer 23). Initial associated treatment (46% vs. 22%, .05) longer LOS (29 12 days; .01). Patients higher rate postoperative (P CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric oncologic treatment, resulted lower complication rates, reduced LOS, fewer alterations regimens compared

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis in Children.

OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children. METHODS This study was conducted as a retrospective comparison of hospital records for postoperative complications, duration of operation, and postoperative length of stay between children (aged <18y) who underwent laparoscopic (n=190) or open (n=199) appendectom...

متن کامل

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND Although laparoscopic appendectomy is widely practiced nowadays, controversy still continues about the advantages of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. To compare LA with OA to determine the length of hospital stay, post operative morbidity and length of operation. METHODS A retrospective study carried out, between February 2009 and January 2012, involving 226 patients (111 mal...

متن کامل

Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Complicated Appendicitis of Children

Background: Laparoscopy is not an accepted procedure for complicated appendicitis in children for most pediatric surgeons. This procedure is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative abdominal abscess reported in some studies. Objectives: In this study, we investigated the security, efficacy and complications of laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis in Mofid Children's...

متن کامل

Early vs interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and adverse event rates of early vs interval appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis. DESIGN Nonblinded randomized trial. SETTING A tertiary-referral urban children's hospital. PATIENTS A total of 131 patients younger than 18 years with a preoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. INTERVENTIONS Early appendectomy (within 24 ho...

متن کامل

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis in Elderly Patients

PURPOSE The appendectomy is the most common emergent surgical procedure in elderly patients. The increasing number of elderly persons has been accompanied by an increase in the number of cases of acute appendicitis in the elderly. In order to understand the clinical significance of a laparoscopic appendectomy for elderly patients with appendicitis, we investigated the results of a laparoscopic ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Pediatrics

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1098-4275', '0031-4005']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-027797